Skip to main content

4 posts tagged with "cursor"

View All Tags

AI Coding Tool Comparison 2026: Claude Code vs Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf

· 11 min read
Scott Havird
Engineer at Georgia-Pacific · ex-WarnerMedia Innovation Lab (ContentAI) · decade shipping AI-powered platforms

AI Coding Tool Comparison 2026: Claude Code vs Cursor vs GitHub Copilot vs Windsurf

I use multiple AI coding tools every day. Not because I'm indecisive — because different tools genuinely excel at different tasks. After a year of tracking my usage through PromptConduit and monitoring releases through Havoptic, I have a data-informed perspective on where each tool shines and where it falls short.

This isn't a surface-level feature checklist. It's an honest assessment from someone who ships production code with these tools daily, tracks their release velocity, and measures their impact on productivity.

TL;DR

Honest head-to-head across six AI coding tools — Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot, Windsurf, Gemini CLI, Codex CLI — from a year of daily use tracked through PromptConduit. The short answer: Claude Code dominates agentic work, Cursor wins autocomplete, and the rest have specific niches.

How to Measure AI Coding Assistant Productivity: A Framework for Engineering Teams

· 11 min read
Scott Havird
Engineer at Georgia-Pacific · ex-WarnerMedia Innovation Lab (ContentAI) · decade shipping AI-powered platforms

How to Measure AI Coding Assistant Productivity: A Framework for Engineering Teams

Here's a question I get asked constantly: "How do you know if AI coding tools are actually making your team more productive?"

It's a fair question. Engineering leaders are investing real budget in Claude Code, Cursor, and GitHub Copilot seats. Developers are restructuring their workflows around these tools. But when someone asks for data — actual numbers on impact — most teams have nothing to show.

I've been working on this problem for over a year, first as an engineering leader trying to justify AI tooling investments at Georgia-Pacific, and then by building PromptConduit to close the analytics gap. Here's the framework I've developed for measuring what actually matters.

TL;DR

Most teams can't prove AI coding ROI because they measure the wrong things. This framework focuses on concrete metrics — commit-assistance rate, PR throughput, cycle-time deltas — instead of vanity numbers. Works across Claude Code, Cursor, and Copilot, and pairs with PromptConduit for automated collection.

PromptConduit: Building Analytics for AI Coding Assistants

· 6 min read
Scott Havird
Engineer at Georgia-Pacific · ex-WarnerMedia Innovation Lab (ContentAI) · decade shipping AI-powered platforms

PromptConduit: Building Analytics for AI Coding Assistants

Every day, I spend hours having conversations with AI coding assistants. Claude Code helps me debug issues, Cursor generates components, and Gemini CLI answers quick questions. But here's the thing: I had no idea what I was actually asking them. What patterns emerged from my prompts? Which tools got invoked most frequently? Was I getting better at prompting over time?

These questions led me to build PromptConduit.

TL;DR

Claude Code and Cursor ship without an analytics layer. PromptConduit fills that gap — it captures, parses, and visualizes prompts across AI coding tools. After tracking 18,700+ prompts across both tools, I have hard data on what engineers actually ask AI tools to do.

AI Agents and the Future of Development: Lessons from a Hackathon

· 7 min read
Scott Havird
Engineer at Georgia-Pacific · ex-WarnerMedia Innovation Lab (ContentAI) · decade shipping AI-powered platforms

AI Agents and the Future of Development: Lessons from a Hackathon

What happens when you give a small team of developers one week, a pile of AI tools, and the audacity to think we could build something meaningful? This is our story from the KOLO AI Hackathon – a journey into what agent-led development might actually look like.

TL;DR

Seven days, one small team, a pile of AI tools, and a genuine attempt to build something real at the KOLO AI Hackathon. What we learned about agent-led development, where it breaks, and why the future of shipping is closer than most teams think.